This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ripe-chair-discuss] Chair nomination process
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] Chair nomination process
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] Chair nomination process
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Lars-Johan Liman
liman at netnod.se
Thu May 14 10:53:50 CEST 2020
randy at psg.com 2020-05-13 11:30 [-0700]: > what would rob say? +1 to that, Randy! Democracy is an ideal that we strive towards. In a perfect world everyone is equally engaged, everyone has equal ability to participate, and equal interest and opportunity to carry their share of the responsibilities. Unfortunately the world is not ideal. The job of RIPE chair is one of being a facilitator. Not a lobbyist for a certain contingent or opinion. The personal properties we should look for are fairness, the ability to negotiate opinions, to create compromise and to unite, not a strong voice for certain opinions. I wish we had a perfect process. We don't. But to be honest, it's better than many others. Transparency is a crucial point on my assessment scale. I wish we hade a wide selection of excellent candidates. We don't. What we have is a limited set of candidates, all of which, IMHO, are likely to do a very good job if chosen. Responsibility of being RIPE chair is something that only a limited set of peole can (for personal reasons) and will want to carry. I wish we had the same amount of engagement in _participating_ (as in being an active member of a group or committee) in the process as we do in criticising the output. We don't. I didn't quite see 200 ppl turn up for a seat on the NomCom. What we have is a limited set of, IMHO, balanced and reliable persons who try to move forward with limited participation from the community and with a limited set of, again IMHO, balanced and reliable candidates - all according to a process that has been decided upon in democratic ways. And they are very transparent about what's going on. I cannot demand more than that, AT THE VERY LEAST not without putting my name on the committee list of X, or without offering my name as a candidate. I will give my feedback to the Nomcom and support my favourite candidate, and I will give the NomCom the cred the deserve. YMMV. Cheers, /Liman -- #---------------------------------------------------------------------- # Lars-Johan Liman, M.Sc. ! E-mail: liman at netnod.se # Senior Systems Specialist ! Tel: +46 8 - 562 860 12 # Netnod Internet Exchange, Stockholm ! http://www.netnod.se/ #----------------------------------------------------------------------
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] Chair nomination process
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] Chair nomination process
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]