[ripe-chair-discuss] Chair nomination process

Daniel,

> ... anti-spoofing-tf ...

I believe you seriously misconstrued the difference between some random
task-force and the process of selection of a Chairman of an entity with an
approximately 35 million euro budget and 25,000'ish members.

I'm with Nick on this one, it "looks troubling". In fact, the optics of
this process "suck" and with great respect to Sander and Joe's comment
about the nomcom earlier in the email thread, I'm not sure the nomcom has
done a good job so far.

Just my thoughts.

Martin


On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 10:36 AM Daniel Karrenberg <dfk at ripe.net> wrote:

> I have served as a task force chair of the anti-spoofing-tf and proposed
> and shepherded major address policies, like ‚rn out fairly‘ while being
> employed by the RIPE NCC.
>
>
> ---
> Sent from a handheld device.
>
> > On 13. May 2020, at 19:22, Nurani Nimpuno <nurani at nimblebits.net> wrote:
> >
> > RIPE NCC staff members do not participate in the policy development
> process, they don’t appoint community members to leadership positions (such
> as WG chairs) and they have also never served as WG chairs whilst still
> being employed by the RIPE NCC.
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/ripe-chair-discuss/attachments/20200513/768c0f99/attachment.html>