This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ripe-chair-discuss@ripe.net/
[ripe-chair-discuss] The RIPE Chair Selection Process - v0.4
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] The RIPE Chair Selection Process - v0.4
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] The RIPE Chair Selection Process - v0.4
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nigel Titley
nigel at titley.com
Mon Mar 25 13:03:59 CET 2019
On 23/03/2019 17:07, Piotr Strzyzewski wrote: > On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 05:17:08PM +0100, Daniel Karrenberg wrote: > > Daniel, > >> Looking around for a credible confirming body within the RIPE >> 'ecosystem' the only one that comes to my mind is the RIPE NCC board. We > > [cut] > >> Of course this >> also assumes that the RIPE NCC board can be convinced to accept the task. > > [cut] > >> Can others please speak up so that this does not become a dialogue but a >> community discussion? And: text please! > > I'm speaking out ;-) But, I'm in doubt here. As EB member I would like > to refrain from discussing this particular idea, but would like to > encourage the others to comment on in. As an outgoing member of the EB that doesn't intend to restand I don't have any irons in the fire here. I think this is a totally inappropriate role for the EB. The EB is there to ensure that the financial affairs of the RIPE NCC are conducted in a sober and businesslike fashion. To be the confirming body is completely outside its remit. Nigel
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] The RIPE Chair Selection Process - v0.4
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] The RIPE Chair Selection Process - v0.4
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]