This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ripe-chair-discuss] The RIPE Chair Selection Process - v0.4
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] The RIPE Chair Selection Process - v0.4
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] The RIPE Chair Selection Process - v0.4
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Piotr Strzyzewski
Piotr.Strzyzewski at polsl.pl
Sat Mar 23 18:07:10 CET 2019
On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 05:17:08PM +0100, Daniel Karrenberg wrote: Daniel, > Looking around for a credible confirming body within the RIPE > 'ecosystem' the only one that comes to my mind is the RIPE NCC board. We [cut] > Of course this > also assumes that the RIPE NCC board can be convinced to accept the task. [cut] > Can others please speak up so that this does not become a dialogue but a > community discussion? And: text please! I'm speaking out ;-) But, I'm in doubt here. As EB member I would like to refrain from discussing this particular idea, but would like to encourage the others to comment on in. Piotr -- Piotr Strzyżewski Silesian University of Technology, Computer Centre Gliwice, Poland
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] The RIPE Chair Selection Process - v0.4
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] The RIPE Chair Selection Process - v0.4
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]