This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ripe-chair-discuss@ripe.net/
[ripe-chair-discuss] Status of RIPE Chair discussion?
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] Status of RIPE Chair discussion?
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] Status of RIPE Chair discussion?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Carsten Schiefner
ripe-wgs.cs at schiefner.de
Wed May 24 10:39:37 CEST 2017
Hi Daniel, breaking it down the way you did here: On 24.05.2017 05:34, Daniel Karrenberg wrote: > Not in my mind. The charter of the accountability task force reads to > me as a 'find holes' mission. We have narrowly avoided the charter to > slso say 'and plug them for us'. > > The charter also excludes looking at the RIPE NCC, which is an > essential part of the success story because it allows RIPE itself to > stay simple and informal. I am not saying that the NCC needs > changing! > > Whst I think is missing is a description of the underlying > principles, how they came about and how they made RIPE work so > well. > > This is a related but different thing. It certsinly is something that > clould be *extremely helpful* for the task force. makes quite some sense to me as well. :-) Best, -C.
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] Status of RIPE Chair discussion?
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] Status of RIPE Chair discussion?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]