[ripe-chair-discuss] Status of RIPE Chair discussion?

Not in my mind. The charter of the accountability task force reads to me as a 'find holes' mission. We have narrowly avoided the charter to slso say 'and plug them for us'.

The charter also excludes looking at the RIPE NCC, which is an essential part of the success story because it allows RIPE itself to stay simple and informal. I am not saying that the NCC needs changing! 

Whst I think is missing is a description of the underlying principles, how they came about  and how they made RIPE work so well.

This is a related but different thing. It certsinly is something that clould be *extremely helpful* for the task force. 

dfk


---
Sent from a handheld device.

> On 24. May 2017, at 01:54, Carsten Schiefner <ripe-wgs.cs at schiefner.de> wrote:
> 
> Daniel -
> 
>> On 22.05.2017 22:58, Daniel Karrenberg wrote:
>> [...]
>> 
>> I also realise that we are missing a "design document" for fundamental
>> ideas behind the RIPE & RIPE NCC system of self-governance. It is all
>> passed on by word-of-mouth and experience. I am quite willing to help
>> write something like this together with a couple of WG chairs; then have
>> the community discuss it. Any takers?
> 
> isn't this in a pretty close vicinity to what the Accountability TF is
> tasked with and is working on?
> 
> Best,
> 
>    -C.
>