[ripe-chair-discuss] Status of RIPE Chair discussion?

On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 01:23:03PM +0200, Daniel Karrenberg wrote:
> On 18.05.17 13:19 , Job Snijders wrote:
> > On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 01:08:23PM +0200, Daniel Karrenberg wrote:
> >> Otherwise I think we have positive movement and maybe even rough
> >> consensus???????
> > 
> > Sure, if you ignore the people that stated that "selected as needed" is
> > not acceptable.
> 
> I referred to Rob Evans' proposal: "The RIPE Chairperson is appointed
> by his/her predecessor, but serves the RIPE community."

Perhaps I am missing something glaring obvious, but you are suggesting
there may be concensus on rob's proposal, which arrived 45 minutes ago
in my mailbox, and to which I have seen only 1 reply (namely yours)?

On topic: the methodology of a chair appointing the next chair does not
look sound to me. It reeks of dynasty and may introduce loss of
peripheral vision.

Kind regards,

Job