[ripe-chair-discuss] RIPE Chair appointment procedure, some ideas

Hi,
(inline)

On Fri, 18 Nov 2016, Brian Nisbet wrote:

> While I quite like the shape of Filiz's suggestions I would be very
> careful of the level of input given to the NCC Management and/or Board.
> While the RIPE Chair has to work very closely with the NCC, this is a
> Community decision and must be clearly seen as same.

+1

> If we do go for a NomCom I'd be inclined to suggest the WG Chairs, the
> RIPE PC and possibly the community selected NRO members.

+1

> I would very much agree with the conflict of interest provisions
> extending to RIPE PC and WG Chairs. Albeit it is easier for them to step
> down than for a permanent NCC staff member! Of course if a candidate
> comes from one of the groups who are making up a NomCom, then they
> should, at the very least, recluse themselves from that whole process.

+1

> Thanks,
>
> Brian

Just a few cents to add:
When talking about the PC, probably involving the non-permanent/(s)elect*d 
PC members -- i.e. RIPE meeting hosts (from the last *N* meetings) -- 
could broaden up a bit the community support (and diversity?).


Cheers,
Carlos