This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ripe-chair-discuss] RIPE Chair appointment procedure, some ideas
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] RIPE Chair appointment procedure, some ideas
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] RIPE Chair appointment procedure, some ideas
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Brian Nisbet
brian.nisbet at heanet.ie
Fri Nov 18 10:26:47 CET 2016
On 18/11/2016 01:34, Jim Reid wrote: > >> On 17 Nov 2016, at 10:18, Filiz Yilmaz <koalafil at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> What about the following, roughly speaking: >> >> - Anybody can be a candidate, with the possible exception of RIPE NCC >> Staff and Board. Otherwise, they need to leave their positions at the >> RIPE NCC, if they get selected as the RIPE Chair at the end of the >> process to avoid conflict of interest or perception of it. >> >> - WG Chairs Collective at the time evaluates all candidates and comes >> up with a list of eligible candidates. >> >> - RIPE Community runs an election among these eligible candidates >> (Like the ones we run for NRO NC reps or RIPE PC...). >> >> - Vice-Chair gets appointed by the elected-RIPE Chair. > > Changing election and elected to selection and selected, would make this work for me.* > > If we can converge on this outline, we can then move on to a discussion about how the RIPE community appoints the Chair. One of those mechanisms might be an election. > > The form of words above pre-judges the outcome of that discussion: ie all possibilities which are not an election are excluded and not to be considered. > > > *I would prefer the evaluation to be done by a broader group than just the WG Chair Collective: the NCC Board and/or Management should probably have a say too. That then starts to look like a nomcom. Hmmm. I also think it would be better to use the same process (whatever that process may be) to appoint the Chair and Vice Chair. Assuming we have a Vice Chair. While I quite like the shape of Filiz's suggestions I would be very careful of the level of input given to the NCC Management and/or Board. While the RIPE Chair has to work very closely with the NCC, this is a Community decision and must be clearly seen as same. If we do go for a NomCom I'd be inclined to suggest the WG Chairs, the RIPE PC and possibly the community selected NRO members. I would very much agree with the conflict of interest provisions extending to RIPE PC and WG Chairs. Albeit it is easier for them to step down than for a permanent NCC staff member! Of course if a candidate comes from one of the groups who are making up a NomCom, then they should, at the very least, recluse themselves from that whole process. Thanks, Brian
- Previous message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] RIPE Chair appointment procedure, some ideas
- Next message (by thread): [ripe-chair-discuss] RIPE Chair appointment procedure, some ideas
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]