[atlas] Missing user tags

Hi Stephane,

We tag these probes with system-ipv4-rfc1918 and system-ipv6-ula. You can
use these tags to include or exclude them in measurements.

Cheers,
Johan

On Wed, 3 Jul 2024 at 16:25, Marco Moock <mm at dorfdsl.de> wrote:

> Am 03.07.2024 um 16:13:31 Uhr schrieb Stephane Bortzmeyer:
>
> > We all know that user tags are imperfect and there is not a lot we can
> > do (except pinging from time to time the hosts, like ICANN does with
> > "Keep your social data up-to-date for your domain", with mixed
> > success).
> >
> > One of the problems is that people tag correctly (I hope so) but do
> > not always tag when it would be useful. For instance, the tag "nat" is
> > sometimes given to probes without NAT (see for instance probes
> > 1000929, 1005290, 1008281 or 50663) but the opposite is much more
> > common. When requesting a measurement withOUT tag "nat", 3/4 of the
> > selected probes have a RFC 1918 IP address (see measurement
> > #74862711) and are certainly NATted.
> >
> > It seems that for many hosts, "nat" is the default.
>
> At least for RFC1918 or ULA this could be a system tag that detects
> that.
> If no outgoing connection to the RIPE is possible via the non-global
> address, NAT won't be given.
>
> --
> Gruß
> Marco
>
> Send unsolicited bulk mail to 1720016011muell at cartoonies.org
>
> --
> ripe-atlas mailing list
> ripe-atlas at ripe.net
> https://mailman.ripe.net/
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/ripe-atlas/attachments/20240704/94671d9b/attachment.html>