This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ripe-atlas@ripe.net/
[atlas] Missing user tags
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] Missing user tags
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] Missing user tags
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Marco Moock
mm at dorfdsl.de
Wed Jul 3 16:25:01 CEST 2024
Am 03.07.2024 um 16:13:31 Uhr schrieb Stephane Bortzmeyer: > We all know that user tags are imperfect and there is not a lot we can > do (except pinging from time to time the hosts, like ICANN does with > "Keep your social data up-to-date for your domain", with mixed > success). > > One of the problems is that people tag correctly (I hope so) but do > not always tag when it would be useful. For instance, the tag "nat" is > sometimes given to probes without NAT (see for instance probes > 1000929, 1005290, 1008281 or 50663) but the opposite is much more > common. When requesting a measurement withOUT tag "nat", 3/4 of the > selected probes have a RFC 1918 IP address (see measurement > #74862711) and are certainly NATted. > > It seems that for many hosts, "nat" is the default. At least for RFC1918 or ULA this could be a system tag that detects that. If no outgoing connection to the RIPE is possible via the non-global address, NAT won't be given. -- Gruß Marco Send unsolicited bulk mail to 1720016011muell at cartoonies.org
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] Missing user tags
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] Missing user tags
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]