[atlas] [mat-wg] RIPE Atlas testing of reserved IPv4 addresses

If we keep in mind the fact that developer time is limited, the decision
should boil down to if there are better places to spend the time on. If
there are more important measurements, then that time should be spent there
instead. That was my point.

On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 6:41 PM Bengt Gördén <bengan at resilans.se> wrote:

> On 2021-02-16 15:55, Avamander wrote:
> > some may find it controversial, but I don't think any effort should be
> spent
> > at extending the life of IPv4. In this case, by extending the address
> space.
>
> I don't agree. This is a measurement tool. Whatever people think about
> extending
> or not extending the lifetime of ipv4 is irrelevant. It shouldn't hinder
> measurements of said networks. If there's networks out there that pass 0/8
> and
> 240/4 it's VERY relevant to measure it. Just because you can't see it it
> doesn't
> mean it's not there.
>
>
> --
> /bengan
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/ripe-atlas/attachments/20210216/ac4962d4/attachment.html>