This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ripe-atlas@ripe.net/
[atlas] [mat-wg] RIPE Atlas Software Probes
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] [mat-wg] RIPE Atlas Software Probes
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] [mat-wg] RIPE Atlas Software Probes
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Robert Kisteleki
robert at ripe.net
Fri Feb 14 10:37:55 CET 2020
To be fair the v1 and v2 (ID<=5000) are 9+ years old tiny embedded devices, their capabilities are nowhere close to anything else one runs Linux on nowadays. Note that our team is also analysing the similarities/differences, but if someone else also wants to look, these are good candidates (same AS, same prefix, approximately same location): https://atlas.ripe.net/probes/1000030/ (sw) https://atlas.ripe.net/probes/28270/ (v3) or: https://atlas.ripe.net/probes/1000041/ (sw) https://atlas.ripe.net/probes/54558/ (v4) Cheers, Robert On 2020-02-14 02:42, Romain Fontugne wrote: > my non-scientific comparison: looking at RTTs in traceroutes the old v1 > seems a msec slower. All are very stable > > Romain > > > On 2/14/20 4:12 AM, Randy Bush wrote: >> if someone wants to compare, 4981 (a lovable old v1), 1000004, and >> 1000006 are on the same lan segment in the same pop with the same vrrp >> exit etc. >> >> randy >> >
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] [mat-wg] RIPE Atlas Software Probes
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] [mat-wg] RIPE Atlas Software Probes
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]