This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ripe-atlas@ripe.net/
[atlas] [mat-wg] RIPE Atlas Software Probes
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] [mat-wg] RIPE Atlas Software Probes
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] [mat-wg] RIPE Atlas Software Probes
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Romain Fontugne
romain at iij.ad.jp
Fri Feb 14 02:42:04 CET 2020
my non-scientific comparison: looking at RTTs in traceroutes the old v1 seems a msec slower. All are very stable Romain On 2/14/20 4:12 AM, Randy Bush wrote: > if someone wants to compare, 4981 (a lovable old v1), 1000004, and > 1000006 are on the same lan segment in the same pop with the same vrrp > exit etc. > > randy > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Screenshot_20200214_103827.png Type: image/png Size: 60829 bytes Desc: not available URL: </ripe/mail/archives/ripe-atlas/attachments/20200214/e78ad0cf/attachment.png>
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] [mat-wg] RIPE Atlas Software Probes
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] [mat-wg] RIPE Atlas Software Probes
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]