This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[atlas] Why has probe growth stagnated?
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] Why has probe growth stagnated?
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] Why has probe growth stagnated?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Michael J. Oghia
mike.oghia at gmail.com
Fri Mar 1 15:21:21 CET 2019
Hi Robert, all: One suggestion is to reach out to community networks operating in Europe and beyond to help ensure their networks are being monitored as well. Let me know if you need me to facilitate any introductions to the wider community via the IGF Dynamic Coalition on Community Connectivity (DC3) email list. Best, -Michael On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 3:15 PM Robert Kisteleki <robert at ripe.net> wrote: > Hello, > > On 2019-02-20 09:36, Gert Doering wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 06:52:28AM +0200, Hank Nussbacher wrote: > >> On Tue, 19 Feb 2019, scg at gibbard.org wrote: > >> > >> ASN coverage is just 5.6%. That really doesn't give a complete global > >> view for stats. Rather than return money to LIRs every year in their > >> bill, why not state that any LIR running an active probe within their > ASN > >> will get a 50Euro credit on their bill? That alone would increase ASN > >> footprint coverage quickly within RIPE. > > > > I like that suggestion :-) > > > > (Not sure how that will pan out if we reach 50% of all LIRs, but to get > > from 5% to 20%, it might definitely be an idea) > > Interesting idea indeed! > > Let me try to address a few points that were mentioned before, perhaps > by providing some background information along the way. > > The growth rate is indeed slower than in the early days. As with > everything, there's no single reason for this. On one hand we had > shortage of hardware probes (which is hopefully solved for the moment, > see: > > https://labs.ripe.net/Members/alun_davies/new-ripe-atlas-version-4-probes/document_view_resolve > ). > On the other hand, it's harder to reach "uncovered" networks and as > someone mentioned before, the "the low hanging fruit being pretty > saturated". > > We measure ASN coverage compared to all ASN-s that announce anything at > all, so depending on how hard one wants to argue for having a probe "in > every AS", this may or may not need improvement. We're certainly > encouraging all our ambassadors and prospective hosts to deploy probes > where we don't have them yet. The current application process has a > built-in preference for new networks. > > For a few years now the procurement of new probes is funded exclusively > by sponsors. Therefore we'd be very happy to see more sponsors stepping up. > > Finally: the public graph about the number of users shows the total we > have so far (meaning users who interacted with RIPE Atlas while they > were logged in via RIPE Access). We can, if this is deemed useful, track > the number of recent users too (for some definition of recent). > > Regards, > Robert > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/ripe-atlas/attachments/20190301/694d9c43/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] Why has probe growth stagnated?
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] Why has probe growth stagnated?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]