This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[atlas] one-off UDMs more expensive?
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] one-off UDMs more expensive?
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] Promote the use of IRC
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Paul Vlaar
pvlaar at afilias.info
Mon Aug 10 13:48:56 CEST 2015
On 10/8/15 1:30 PM, Robert Kisteleki wrote: > One-offs are more expensive for the system to execute: they need immediate > scheduling and result delivery is done with priority for example, so they > cost more. Aha, in that case, I would love to see the possibility to request one-off measurements that do not require to be immediately scheduled, and for which result delivery is not done with any priority over periodical ones. Alternatively, I could also just create a regular periodical UDM and specify a stop time in the near future, in order to save credits upon doing measurements that need to be run only once. Trying that gives me an interesting result though: I can't place the stop time within 2 hours of the current time, is that to be expected? ~paul
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] one-off UDMs more expensive?
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] Promote the use of IRC
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]