This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ripe-atlas@ripe.net/
[atlas] one-off UDMs more expensive?
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] one-off UDMs more expensive?
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] one-off UDMs more expensive?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Robert Kisteleki
robert at ripe.net
Mon Aug 10 13:30:52 CEST 2015
On 2015-08-10 11:59, Paul Vlaar wrote: > As I go through the web interface to setup a UDM I notice the following: > > For the same DNS measurement, when I specify an interval of 24 hours > between samples, the total daily cost comes to 10. When however I > specify this to be a one-off sample, the cost then doubles to 20. Cost for one-off measurements is indeed twice the amount of the regular ones. This is documented at https://atlas.ripe.net/docs/credits/ > This doesn't seem to make sense to me. Is there a special reason for > one-off measurements to be twice as expensive? One-offs are more expensive for the system to execute: they need immediate scheduling and result delivery is done with priority for example, so they cost more. Regards, Robert > ~paul >
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] one-off UDMs more expensive?
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] one-off UDMs more expensive?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]