This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[atlas] "Spoofing" tests.
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] "Spoofing" tests.
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] "Spoofing" tests.
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Andrei Robachevsky
robachevsky at isoc.org
Mon Sep 16 12:51:43 CEST 2013
Tapio Sokura wrote on 9/15/13 5:08 AM: > >> what useful is actually being measured? unless it's a name and shame >> game. and then you will want to know if things 'improve' over time, >> which means it is not a one-shot. > > Name and shame can work in some cases. It can be a "name and shame" with a positive spin - an "anti-spoofing" movement I mentioned before. A network can get and stay on a list if (until) they pass a spoofer or atlas test. I think it can help raise awareness and attention to this issue, at least. Andrei
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] "Spoofing" tests.
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] "Spoofing" tests.
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]