[atlas] "Spoofing" tests.

On 15.9.2013 5:16, Randy Bush wrote:
>> A concrete demonstration on the prevalence(?) of networks allowing
>> source address spoofing would help in getting this hole plugged
>
> a jillion spoofed botnets did not make the point pretty clearly?

Yes, but because they are spoofed, it's not easy to determine which 
networks are the ones that allow spoofing.

> what useful is actually being measured?  unless it's a name and shame
> game.  and then you will want to know if things 'improve' over time,
> which means it is not a one-shot.

Name and shame can work in some cases. And yes, I'd like to see a trend, 
i.e. not making this a one-shot deal. Even if there is a bias towards 
probes being in networks that care, the way the figures change over time 
(derivative) should be less biased.

   Tapio