This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[atlas] No address in the results when ping or traceroute fail?
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] No address in the results when ping or traceroute fail?
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] No address in the results when ping or traceroute fail?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Philip Homburg
philip.homburg at ripe.net
Tue Jul 23 10:55:54 CEST 2013
On 2013/07/22 16:39 , Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 04:29:52PM +0200, > Philip Homburg <philip.homburg at ripe.net> wrote > a message of 23 lines which said: > >> The probe didn't actually send any packets so there is no point in >> knowing the source address that wasn't used. :-) > I wanted to reply to Dan Wing's criticism > <https://labs.ripe.net/Members/stephane_bortzmeyer/how-many-atlas-probes-believe-they-have-ipv6-but-are-wrong/> > "I have a suspicion that many of these failures are IPv6 tunnels that > have suffered bit rot. Could you analyze the IPv6 address that the > Atlas probe thinks it has and split them into two categories: (a) > known tunnels (e.g., Hurricane Electric, SixXS, 6to4, Teredo) versus > (b) presumably "native" IPv6 addresses. " > Stephane, Well, if you can give me a list of probes for which you don't have the IPv6 address then I can look them up for you. Philip
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] No address in the results when ping or traceroute fail?
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] No address in the results when ping or traceroute fail?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]