This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ripe-atlas@ripe.net/
[atlas] No address in the results when ping or traceroute fail?
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] No address in the results when ping or traceroute fail?
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] No address in the results when ping or traceroute fail?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Stephane Bortzmeyer
bortzmeyer at nic.fr
Mon Jul 22 16:39:36 CEST 2013
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 04:29:52PM +0200, Philip Homburg <philip.homburg at ripe.net> wrote a message of 23 lines which said: > The probe didn't actually send any packets so there is no point in > knowing the source address that wasn't used. :-) I wanted to reply to Dan Wing's criticism <https://labs.ripe.net/Members/stephane_bortzmeyer/how-many-atlas-probes-believe-they-have-ipv6-but-are-wrong/> "I have a suspicion that many of these failures are IPv6 tunnels that have suffered bit rot. Could you analyze the IPv6 address that the Atlas probe thinks it has and split them into two categories: (a) known tunnels (e.g., Hurricane Electric, SixXS, 6to4, Teredo) versus (b) presumably "native" IPv6 addresses. "
- Previous message (by thread): [atlas] No address in the results when ping or traceroute fail?
- Next message (by thread): [atlas] No address in the results when ping or traceroute fail?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]