This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ncc-services-wg] the semantics of "setting the fee structure"
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2012-07's direct engagement option
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2012-07's direct engagement option
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jim Reid
jim at rfc1035.com
Tue Apr 22 23:28:30 CEST 2014
I think something is being lost in translation. The membership determine the fee structure. Albeit one that's been worked out by the people the membership has delegated the responsibility for working that out. This is not the same thing has the membership "setting the fee structure" by deciding what the absolute values of those fees should be. That would be unworkable. Of course if the proposed fees are too high or low, the membership can vote reject the charging scheme and indirectly cause new fees to be set.
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2012-07's direct engagement option
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2012-07's direct engagement option
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]