[ncc-services-wg] 2012-07's direct engagement option

Hi,

On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:41:20PM +0200, Hans Petter Holen wrote:
> > Repeat: the AGM does *not* "set fee structure".  It can accept the board's
> > proposed charging scheme, or keep the old one.
> 
> I do not agree.
> When the fee structure was changed in september 2012 the board gave the
> AGM several options  based on input from the AGM in the first half of
> 2012.

Yes.  This was one notable exception.  And it happened after quite a lot
of noise was made about it.  Another exception was when the AP community
asked for a reasonable price tag on PI networks in the context of 2007-01,
and that needed quite a bit of pushing and convincing to see the light.

About every other time in the last 15 years, the options to vote on the
charging scheme have been "accept the new charging scheme? (yes/no)".

Right here it's the same thing again:  "Look what we've made up, take
it or leave it".  How does the AGM "set the fee structure" here?

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 811 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/ncc-services-wg/attachments/20140422/4dbdd411/attachment.sig>