[ncc-services-wg] 2012-07's direct engagement option

On 22/04/2014 10:13, Tore Anderson wrote:
> There appears to be no way possible combination of votes that I can cast
> at GM that would establish a *useful* DAU option in line with how the
> community and 2012-07 authors wanted it (i.e., one where "reasonable
> charges" means "significantly cheaper than full LIR status"). I find
> that quite problematic!

you could ask for some time to talk about it at the GM, maybe with a formal
petition to the board?

Personally, I don't think this is worth getting upset about.  Nor do I see
that there is any issue with being "beholden to an LIR".  If you don't like
your LIR, then you change and get another.  There are 10000 of them and
changing sponsoring LIR is not hard (been there, done that, T shirt wasn't
worth printing).

If there are issues with certification of legacy / directly assigned ipv4
resources, then they should be dealt with separately by e.g. the ripe ncc
providing an option for this to be delegated directly to the assignee / end
user.

Nick