[ncc-services-wg] 2012-07 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (RIPE NCC Services to Legacy Internet Resource Holders)

Thanks for the clarification,

so I fully support V4 of 2012-07.

A big THANKS to everyone who contributed to that important project!
Wilfried

Niall O'Reilly wrote:

> On 21 Oct 2013, at 15:12, Wilfried Woeber wrote:
> 
> 
>>While working through the Impact Analysis I am somewhat at a loss how
>>Option 1 and Option 3 are to be handled.
>>
>>In particular, going for Option 1: would the Legacy Resource lose its
>>status: LEGACY and be relabelled to PI or PA?
> 
> 
> 	No.
> 
> 
>>If this is the case, I do not see the rationale for the text in Option 3:
>>
>>	In the latter case, however, it should be made clear that the RIPE
>>	NCC will not allow the Legacy Resource Holder to become the
>>	sponsoring LIR for its own Legacy Internet Resources.
>>
>>In case the status: LEGACY for Option 1 is preserved, then I can agree to
>>the restriction as quoted.
>>
>>Any clarification would be appreciated.
> 
> 
> 	There is an option, under section 1.2 (Scope) for relabelling,
> 	but then the resource in question is placed outside the scope of
> 	the proposed policy.
> 
> 	I hope this helps.
> 
> 	Best regards,
> 	Niall
>