[ncc-services-wg] 2012-07 New Draft Document and Impact Analysis Published (RIPE NCC Services to Legacy Internet Resource Holders)

On 21 Oct 2013, at 15:12, Wilfried Woeber wrote:

> While working through the Impact Analysis I am somewhat at a loss how
> Option 1 and Option 3 are to be handled.
> 
> In particular, going for Option 1: would the Legacy Resource lose its
> status: LEGACY and be relabelled to PI or PA?

	No.

> If this is the case, I do not see the rationale for the text in Option 3:
> 
> 	In the latter case, however, it should be made clear that the RIPE
> 	NCC will not allow the Legacy Resource Holder to become the
> 	sponsoring LIR for its own Legacy Internet Resources.
> 
> In case the status: LEGACY for Option 1 is preserved, then I can agree to
> the restriction as quoted.
> 
> Any clarification would be appreciated.

	There is an option, under section 1.2 (Scope) for relabelling,
	but then the resource in question is placed outside the scope of
	the proposed policy.

	I hope this helps.

	Best regards,
	Niall