[ncc-services-wg] 2013-04 New Policy Proposal (Resource Certification for non-RIPE NCC Members)

On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 06:23:16PM +0200, Sander Steffann wrote:
>I just read the Regulation you mentioned but I fail to see how 
>this would even apply to anything mentioned in this discussion...

That's why I asked a lawyer. In simple words: The NCC is vulnerable to
court orders from anywhere within the EU.

>>> Ah, ok. But since your assumption is invalid (there is no default,
>>> and the quick-start examples which would probably be used for such a
>>> "lazy default" are completely different from what you assume) then
>>> your case isn't very interesting to discuss any further.

[citation needed]

>> There may not be a default *yet*, but there will be and it will be
>> "drop if invalid/missing" because that is much easier to understand
>> ifor the decision-makers than localprefs, metrics, etc.

>Ok, now you are making even more unfounded assumptions. Please stop

Well, if you can see the future any better than I, please enlighten us.

rgds,
Sascha Luck