This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ncc-services-wg] 2013-04 New Policy Proposal (Resource Certification for non-RIPE NCC Members)
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2013-04 New Policy Proposal (Resource Certification for non-RIPE NCC Members)
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2013-04 New Policy Proposal (Resource Certification for non-RIPE NCC Members)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sander Steffann
sander at steffann.nl
Mon May 20 18:23:16 CEST 2013
> On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 04:57:33PM +0200, Sander Steffann wrote: >> Please read the legal statement from the NCC I linked to. You are >> contradicting it. If you have better legal advice than the RIPE NCC's >> own lawyers then please contact the NCC. > > I *have* taken legal advice and it does not contradict the NCC statement > at all. > According to Regulation 44/2001 http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:32001R0044:EN:NOT > a judgment from a member state must be declared enforceable in the > member state where it applies. This is pretty automatic, certainly not > very complicated. Once the declaration of exequatur is issued, it'll > have the same force as a dutch judgment which the NCC will (must) comply with. > Note this is civil law, not criminal. I just read the Regulation you mentioned but I fail to see how this would even apply to anything mentioned in this discussion... >> Ah, ok. But since your assumption is invalid (there is no default, and >> the quick-start examples which would probably be used for such a "lazy >> default" are completely different from what you assume) then your case >> isn't very interesting to discuss any further. > > There may not be a default *yet*, but there will be and it will be "drop > if invalid/missing" because that is much easier to understand ifor the > decision-makers than localprefs, metrics, etc. Ok, now you are making even more unfounded assumptions. Please stop that. Sander
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2013-04 New Policy Proposal (Resource Certification for non-RIPE NCC Members)
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2013-04 New Policy Proposal (Resource Certification for non-RIPE NCC Members)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]