This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ncc-services-wg] 2012-08 New Policy Proposal (Publication of Sponsoring LIR for Independent Number Resources)
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2012-08 New Policy Proposal (Publication of Sponsoring LIR for Independent Number Resources)
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2012-08 New Policy Proposal (Publication of Sponsoring LIR for Independent Number Resources)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Tore Anderson
tore at fud.no
Thu Feb 14 15:19:27 CET 2013
* Niall O'Reilly > On 17 Oct 2012, at 20:11, Randy Bush wrote: > >> this one seems a no brainer to me. it's just part of proper and open >> documentation of registration and allocation, the ncc's primary job. >> >> as far as the lir not wanting to be known to have sponsored a pi site, >> if the lir is ashamed of doing something, maybe they should not have >> done it. i just don't get this stuff. >> >> correct and open documentation is the ncc's primary job. > > Although I've let the closing date of the Discussion Phase slip by, > I hope it's not too late to say that this seems a no-brainer to me too, > that I agree with Randy's remark about the NCC's "primary job", and > that I hope the proposer will decide to advance this proposal to the > Review Phase. What Randy and Niall said. Support. -- Tore Anderson
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2012-08 New Policy Proposal (Publication of Sponsoring LIR for Independent Number Resources)
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2012-08 New Policy Proposal (Publication of Sponsoring LIR for Independent Number Resources)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]