This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ncc-services-wg] 2012-08 New Policy Proposal (Publication of Sponsoring LIR for Independent Number Resources)
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2012-08 New Policy Proposal (Publication of Sponsoring LIR for Independent Number Resources)
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2012-08 New Policy Proposal (Publication of Sponsoring LIR for Independent Number Resources)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sascha Luck
lists-ripe at c4inet.net
Thu Oct 18 00:10:27 CEST 2012
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 11:20:53PM +0200, Michael Markstaller wrote: >Thats clear but there IMHO must be some path to get hold of the user - >either via sponsoring LIR or via upstream (which might be more >complicated but also a way..) I'm not actually concerned about your use-case of an uncontactable PI end-user, that is entirely legit. What worries me more is every internet muppet and their brother now being able to harass and threaten a LIR for any perceived wrong by a sponsored end-user (when the LIR could actually not even do anything about it). >>> Just a suggestion: If its only about privacy, a tradeoff could >>> be: only visible for LIRs in lirportal (?) This would at least mitigate against kooks and randomers. Most LIRs should know about the PI-sponsoring relationship. rgds, Sascha
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2012-08 New Policy Proposal (Publication of Sponsoring LIR for Independent Number Resources)
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2012-08 New Policy Proposal (Publication of Sponsoring LIR for Independent Number Resources)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]