This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ncc-services-wg] Policy proposal for services to legacy Internet resource holders
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Policy proposal for services to legacy Internet resource holders
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Policy proposal for services to legacy Internet resource holders
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sander Steffann
sander at steffann.nl
Wed Aug 29 12:19:59 CEST 2012
Hi Nigel, > This actually raises an interesting issue. Are there any circumstances in which RIPE policy would apply to legacy space? Could, for example, the AP-WG unilaterally propose a policy that annexed legacy space? IANAL, but I think that would not be legally possible. > I've heard this suggested several times. And of course, if RIPE policy doesn't apply to legacy space, why are the legacy holders raising a proposal at all? If it was about address policy I would have definitely pulled the proposal towards APWG. This is about the RIPE NCC providing services like the RIPE database and reverse DNS. That is why this policy proposal is in the NCC-Services WG. - Sander
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Policy proposal for services to legacy Internet resource holders
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Policy proposal for services to legacy Internet resource holders
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]