This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ncc-services-wg] LIR association with number resources
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] LIR association with number resources
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] LIR association with number resources
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Alex Band
alexb at ripe.net
Sun Aug 12 09:07:17 CEST 2012
On 4 Aug 2012, at 19:25, Nick Hilliard <nick at netability.ie> wrote: > It's certainly been discussed before without any particular conclusion, but > I didn't gather from the various WG discussions - either at RIPE meetings > or on the mailing lists - that it stalled due to privacy concerns. Do you > have a reference for this? First thing I could find is a message by David Freedman from July last year: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/db-wg/2011-July/003745.html >> After the feedback from the DB-WG Meeting in Vienna last week, I'd like to = >> bring this back to the list. >> >> I'd like to see the RegID (or equivalent) displayed for all resources in th= >> e database, this will help us identify the >> holder of: >> >> * PA Allocations (currently found in >> alloclist >> , currently attached Org-= >> ID) >> * PA Assignments (only found through less specific aggregate inetnum an= >> d as per above) >> * PI Assignments (not found at all) >> * Autonomous systems (not found at all?) >> >> The privacy issues concerning publishing are currently being investigated b= >> y the NCC and a number of people have expressed concern about revealing com= >> mercial relationships, >> especially with regards to revealing the sponsoring LIR for a particular en= >> d-user resource (though, I did make the point that you can ask the NCC a di= >> rect question about who the >> sponsoring LIR is and lack of policy means they reveal this). >> >> The technical issue concerning publishing , is that using the RegID may not= >> be the best idea, the NCC say "It is for internal use" (but it is the only= >> thing I see in my LIR portal?), why not use the >> OrgID (but this doesn't relate to the RegID , how do I link this to a bone = >> fide LIR?) , one issue with using the regID over the orgID may be that the = >> regID would simply be represented in the >> database as a string , since there is no related object to tie it to (which= >> may be an undesirable outcome). >> >> Dave. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/ncc-services-wg/attachments/20120812/e96db636/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 2355 bytes Desc: not available URL: </ripe/mail/archives/ncc-services-wg/attachments/20120812/e96db636/attachment.p7s>
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] LIR association with number resources
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] LIR association with number resources
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]