This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ncc-services-wg] Re: [db-wg] "referral-by:" attribute
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Re: [db-wg] "referral-by:" attribute
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Re: [db-wg] "referral-by:" attribute
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Leo Vegoda
leo.vegoda at icann.org
Tue Jun 8 15:11:28 CEST 2010
On Jun 8, 2010, at 5:54 AM, Shane Kerr wrote: > On Tue, 2010-06-08 at 12:37 +0200, Denis Walker wrote: >> If we make it optional now, although it is still in the RPSL definition, >> it can be completely ignored. Does anyone have any strong views on this >> either way? > > I'd actually suggest going further, and getting rid of it completely. > > I think the change could be done so that "referral-by:" attributes would > be automatically removed when an addition or update was made, so that > people don't have to change their software when creating maintainer > objects. In theory this warning could be converted to an error at some > point in the future, but I don't think it would actually ever be > necessary. I agree with Shane. Let's clean up after ourselves. Regards, Leo
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Re: [db-wg] "referral-by:" attribute
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Re: [db-wg] "referral-by:" attribute
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]