This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ncc-services-wg@ripe.net/
[ncc-services-wg] Re: [db-wg] "referral-by:" attribute
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] "referral-by:" attribute
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Re: [db-wg] "referral-by:" attribute
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Shane Kerr
shane at time-travellers.org
Tue Jun 8 14:54:48 CEST 2010
Denis, On Tue, 2010-06-08 at 12:37 +0200, Denis Walker wrote: > If we make it optional now, although it is still in the RPSL definition, > it can be completely ignored. Does anyone have any strong views on this > either way? I'd actually suggest going further, and getting rid of it completely. I think the change could be done so that "referral-by:" attributes would be automatically removed when an addition or update was made, so that people don't have to change their software when creating maintainer objects. In theory this warning could be converted to an error at some point in the future, but I don't think it would actually ever be necessary. -- Shane
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] "referral-by:" attribute
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Re: [db-wg] "referral-by:" attribute
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]