This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ncc-services-wg@ripe.net/
[ncc-services-wg] Independent Resource procedure and implementation
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Independent Resource procedure and implementation
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Independent Resource procedure and implementation
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Daniel Suchy
danny at danysek.cz
Fri Sep 4 01:23:23 CEST 2009
Hi Max, of course I understand this. But this is not case of small (and recent) LIRs. I have no problem with filling of missing informations, but this my discussion is about informations already contained in RIPE database. One of attributes is last update information. RIPE NCC staff can work with this - but probably they ignore this information. Daniel On 09/03/2009 07:54 PM, Max Tulyev wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > as we have hundreds of PI and ASNs, we have some experience with that, > and this question is very important for us too. > > In ancient times RIPE DB had no org: in aut-num. So link ASN with a > company is not established. I also know a lot of cases when someone use > not their ASN with their inetnum, and vice version. So if someone > announce his network with some ASN (you can see it in RIS, sure) - it > NOT means it is THEIR ASN. Only the way to know it - ask them and ask > the contract or some other legal notification. >
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Independent Resource procedure and implementation
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Independent Resource procedure and implementation
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]