This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ncc-services-wg] 2007-01 Phase 2 Implementation: Direct Internet Resource Assignments to End Users from the RIPE NCC
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2007-01 Phase 2 Implementation: Direct Internet Resource Assignments to End Users from the RIPE NCC
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2007-01 Phase 2 Implementation: Direct Internet Resource Assignments to End Users from the RIPE NCC
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Max Tulyev
president at ukraine.su
Fri May 29 11:45:44 CEST 2009
Sergey, it not depends on want I to earn some money or not want. It is about will all the scheme survive or not. Anyway, I can write in contract "the sum from RIPE NCC billing scheme added NN percent for LIR service" - and the question is I can't explain users how much they will pay, even approximately. Even in that case, some of billing scheme candidates don't have clear price for each object. Sergey Myasoedov wrote: > Max, > > you can charge your customers without any profit. This will be fair and clear. They will > pay exactly the amount was described in charging scheme and was approved by the GM. > But you want to have a profit. So you will have some risks. Relax, this situation is > usual. > -- WBR, Max Tulyev (MT6561-RIPE, 2:463/253 at FIDO)
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2007-01 Phase 2 Implementation: Direct Internet Resource Assignments to End Users from the RIPE NCC
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] 2007-01 Phase 2 Implementation: Direct Internet Resource Assignments to End Users from the RIPE NCC
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]