This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ncc-services-wg@ripe.net/
[ncc-services-wg] Lawsuits and recovering lost IP addresses
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Re: [dns-wg] ccTLD Mailing List
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Lawsuits and recovering lost IP addresses
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hank Nussbacher
hank at efes.iucc.ac.il
Thu Aug 25 11:53:58 CEST 2005
Not sure which WG to post this so I'll try here. Hypothetical case: Suppose there is an ISP that has a /16. They never informed their customers that the assigned PA address space has to be returned once they disconnect from their service (see http://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ipv4-policies.html#pa_pi for how it should be done, but wasn't in the past). Now when they see all sorts of announcements of /24s and /22s from their block and they try to recover these lost IPs (contacting the ex-customer or their usptreams to terminate announcement), they are threatened with lawsuits that deletion of the IPs will cause irrepairable harm to the ex-customer and the fact that the LIR never informed the customer of PA recovery therefore entitles them to keep the IPs - forever - or for however long they wish. I don't want this to be a long thread on the pros and cons and what should or shouldn't be done. What I am *specifically* looking for is actual lawsuits and court cases that have taken place in the RIPE sphere in this area and what the outcome of those lawsuits were. Thanks, Hank
- Previous message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Re: [dns-wg] ccTLD Mailing List
- Next message (by thread): [ncc-services-wg] Lawsuits and recovering lost IP addresses
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]