[members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members

Pardon me for interrupting.

But is it such a hard concept for everyone to meet in the middle and 
agree that we should all probably pay a little less?

I think a good starting point is simply asking why does the budget need 
to be so large to begin with?

Daniel~

On 5/15/24 11:36 AM, Gert Doering wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 06:31:41PM +0200, Mentor Leniqi wrote:
>> Heh, i would'n post that much if the policy was fair just like other RIRs
>> do charge based on resource. Let's be honest, if you agreed that posting
>> too much should be charged more, i totally agree and a lot of other members
>> too, holding more resources should pay more. Very simple isn't it?
> That's back to "I want everyone else to pay more, and I want to pay less".
>
> I want the same thing, but of course *we* should pay less, and *you* should
> pay more.  And I can find lots of arguments why this is more fair (like,
> because we build this whole thing that you can now take for granted, or
> something else).
>
> So, a reasonable compromise seems to be "all members pay the same", and
> this is what members vote for, multiple times.
>
> Gert Doering
>          -- NetMaster
>
> _______________________________________________
> members-discuss mailing list
> members-discuss at ripe.net
> https://mailman.ripe.net/
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/daniel%40privatesystems.net