[members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members

Heh, i would'n post that much if the policy was fair just like other RIRs
do charge based on resource. Let's be honest, if you agreed that posting
too much should be charged more, i totally agree and a lot of other members
too, holding more resources should pay more. Very simple isn't it?

On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 6:26 PM Gert Doering <gert at space.net> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 06:20:05PM +0200, Mentor Leniqi wrote:
> >    I believe RIPE  it is the only RIR who charges its members the same
> > amount no matter the resource holder! Other RIRs like APNIC and many
> other
> > RIRs:
> >
> https://www.apnic.net/get-ip/apnic-membership/how-much-does-it-cost/member-fees-calculator/
> > have a great and fair solution about resource holders.
>
> Again that funny argument that this would be "more fair".  I could argue
> that you should be charged more, because you are posting so much to the
> ripe-members list, which costs lots of time.  Wouldn't that be "more fair"?
>
> > If you believe that only you and or RIPE is right then tell other RIRs
> > should be sued!
>
> I do not need to sue anyone.  The members have voted last year that they
> did not want the category scheme proposed.  Very easy.
>
> Gert Doering
>         -- NetMaster
> --
> have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
>
> SpaceNet AG                      Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Ingo
> Lalla,
>                                            Karin Schuler, Sebastian Cler
> Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14        Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
> D-80807 Muenchen                 HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
> Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444         USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20240515/17237fbd/attachment.html>