This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[members-discuss] GM topic
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] GM topic
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] GM topic
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Kurt Jaeger
members-discuss at nepustil.net
Wed May 1 17:54:32 CEST 2024
Hi! > When I see the RIPE invoices arrive every year, I always ask the same > question: Why do I have to pay for a service I never use? The founders of RIPE had (approx. 30 years ago) in mind what would happen if the ISP community would not self-organise the IP address/number management. (I followed those discussions at that time via email lists etc). It was a very wise and forward-looking decision to have it structured like it is structured right now. Compare RIPE/IETF/etc with ITU and specs from the telco world. Compare RIPE/IETF/etc with the way mobile frequencies are managed. One scenario was to have the governments handle the numbers management. We can be sure it would much more expensive (fee structure) and slower and would still cost the ISP much more money to apply for resources. One scenario was that the big TelCos would start a sort of club and sort it out between themselves. No small niche players/startups would have been possible. Endless lawsuits between the big TelCos and the competition authorities and the different countries, trying to eek out bizarre thousand-page thick rulebooks with endless exceptions. One scenario was that basically the US government would decide all of that. *Those* were some of the possible futures at that time. We would live in a different internet world nowadays, the innovation and cost curve would look much different and most of the LIRs today would not exist at all. It will not be easy to find a solution for our time/structure today, but we should invest the time we have thanks to the RIPE financial reserves to really dig into short-, mid- and long-term scenarios with a much wider view of the possible futures. That's why keeping the fee structure the same for the time being and use our discussion bandwidth to look at the broader view is a sensible way out. (speaking for 2 LIRs, with a bit of history in mind) -- MfG/Best regards, Kurt Jaeger Now what ? Dr.-Ing. Nepustil & Co. GmbH fon +49 7123 93006-0 pi at nepustil.net Rathausstr. 3 mob +49 171 3101372 72658 Bempflingen
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] GM topic
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] GM topic
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]