This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[members-discuss] GM topic
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] GM topic
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] GM topic
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Simon-Jan Haytink
simonjh at ripe.net
Wed May 1 15:18:24 CEST 2024
Dear Kai, Please see my previous mail to Patrick on what has happened between last year and today. On the ability to transfer resources to another RIR, you can see the details here:https://www.ripe.net/manage-ips-and-asns/resource-transfers-and-mergers/inter-rir-transfers/ <https://www.ripe.net/manage-ips-and-asns/resource-transfers-and-mergers/inter-rir-transfers/> Best regards, Simon Jan Haytink RIPE NCC CFO On 30/04/2024 15:29, Kai Siering via members-discuss wrote: > Moin, > > am 30.04.24 um 13:57 schrieb Simon-Jan Haytink: >> As an association, we need to ensure we do not become too dependent >> on large multinational contributors that can easily move >> registrations to other RIRs. > > Well, IANAL, but I'd like to understand why anybody should be able to > move "their" resources out of the RIPE Service Region in the first > place. If they are not to be used within the RIPE Service Region > anymore, clearly the provisions for allocating these resources (from > those managed by the RIPE NCC for the RIPE Service Region) don't apply > anymore, hence these have to be returned to the RIPE NCC. > >> We see and have accepted the fact that last year’s category model was >> not without its flaws. To ensure we can actually submit a model that >> is as good as possible, we will need time to further consult with our >> members, and that could well result in a category or tiered model. >> […] Overall, we see and acknowledge the need to seriously review our >> charging model, but what we are asking for is time and stability in >> the short term so we can put in the required work to come up with a >> model that works. > > So, what happened between April 2023 and April 2024 in this area? Did > I miss the request for input for a new charging model after the > proposed category model failed approvement last year? See, I do read > your lines, but I fail to see appropriate action by the Board in this > regard — only after the current backfire came statements like yours, > but that's just too little much too late, imho. > > Regards, > -kai > -- > Kai Siering > Senior System Engineer > > mail.de GmbH > Münsterstraße 3 > D-33330 Gütersloh > > Tel.: +49 (0) 5241 / 74 34 986 > Fax: +49 (0) 5241 / 74 34 987 > E-Mail:k.siering at team.mail.de > Web:https://mail.de/ > > Geschäftsführender Gesellschafter: > Fabian Bock > > Sitz der Gesellschaft Nordhastedt > Handelsregister Pinneberg HRB 8007 PI > Steuernummer 18 293 20020 > > _______________________________________________ > members-discuss mailing list > members-discuss at ripe.net > https://mailman.ripe.net/ > Unsubscribe:https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/simonjh%40ripe.net -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20240501/d5a9edd5/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] GM topic
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] GM topic
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]