[members-discuss] Charging scheme 2025 proposal (logarithmic)

I'am agree with it!

> Hi Sebastien,
>
> I think IPv6 allocations larger than /29 aren't very common. Your proposal
> again puts too much load on smaller LIRs. I strongly prefer the several
> proposed linear models like:
>
> - 0.01 to 0.1 EUR per IPv4/32 (multiple proposals)
> - 7.92 EUR per IPv4/24 (my proposal of 2024-04-12 => Neutral to current
> RIPE NCC budget)
> - 20 EUR per IPv4/24 for the first 1750 /24 (James A.T. Rice's proposal of
> 2024-04-19)
>
> @RIPE: I would like to see at least one of the above models to choose
> from.
>
> @Sebastien: Your proposal is by FAR the most expensive for smaller LIRs:
> Your Cost for the smaller LIRs following the proposed parameters:
> 1st /24: free
> 1st /23: 217 (EUR 109 per /24)
> 1st /22: 501 (EUR 125 per /24)
> 1st /21: 873 (EUR 108 per /24)
> 1st /20: 1361 (EUR 85 per /24)
> 1st /19: 2000 (EUR 62 per /24)
> 1st /18: 2837 (EUR 44 per /24)
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Claudius
>
>
> --
> Kantonsschule Zug/AS34288
> Claudius Zingerli, Dr. sc. ETH Zürich
> Technischer Leiter Informatik, NOC
> Luessiweg 24
> 6300 Zug
> Switzerland
> claudius.zingerli at ksz.ch
> Tel: +41 41 728 1212
> Direkt: +41 41 728 1307
>
>
> On 20.04.24 10:32, Sebastien Brossier wrote:
>> On 16/04/2024 16:37, Mihail Fedorov wrote:
>>> I once again advise to put less charges on IPv6. Genrally it’s a good
>>> and correct approach. But in current reality this will result need to
>>> restructure v6 subnets for everyone, who opted into /29 but using /32
>>> (which is what many small LIRs do) and create additional work for
>>> everyone. In some distant future there will be no difference but for
>>> now every occasion to motivate networks to have IPv6 should be valued.
>>>
>>> Apart from that that’s the scheme I would be happy to vote for.
>>
>> Finally found some time to test some variants.
>> Alternative parameters, where you can have up to /29 IPv6 at base fee
>> (same total budget):
>>
>> Base_Fee = 700 EUR
>> Bit_Factor = 1.31
>> Minimum_Fee = Base_Fee
>> Offset_IPv4 = 8
>> Offset_IPv6 = 27
>>
>> No allocations:              700 EUR
>> IPv4 /24 and/or IPv6 /29:       700 EUR
>> IPv4 /23 and/or IPv6 /28:       917 EUR
>> IPv4 /22 and/or IPv6 /27:      1201 EUR
>> IPv4 /21 and/or IPv6 /26:      1573 EUR
>> IPv4 /20 and/or IPv6 /25:      2061 EUR
>> IPv4 /19 and/or IPv6 /24:      2700 EUR
>> IPv4 /18 and/or IPv6 /23:      3537 EUR
>> IPv4 /17 and/or IPv6 /22:      4634 EUR
>> IPv4 /16 and/or IPv6 /21:      6071 EUR
>> IPv4 /15 and/or IPv6 /20:      7953 EUR
>> IPv4 /14 and/or IPv6 /19:     10418 EUR
>> IPv4 /13 and/or IPv6 /18:     13648 EUR
>> IPv4 /12 and/or IPv6 /17:     17879 EUR
>> IPv4 /11 and/or IPv6 /16:     23422 EUR
>> IPv4 /10 and/or IPv6 /15:     30682 EUR
>> IPv4 /9 and/or IPv6 /14:     40194 EUR
>> IPv4 /8 and/or IPv6 /13:     52654 EUR
>> Largest LIR:            65143 EUR
>>
>>
>> Sebastien Brossier
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> members-discuss mailing list
>> members-discuss at ripe.net
>> https://mailman.ripe.net/
>> Unsubscribe:
>> https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/claudius.zingerli%40ksz.ch
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> members-discuss mailing list
> members-discuss at ripe.net
> https://mailman.ripe.net/
> Unsubscribe:
> https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/sdy%40a-n-t.ru
>


-----------------------------
Serbulov Dmitry