This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[members-discuss] Charging scheme 2025 proposal (logarithmic)
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Charging scheme 2025 proposal (logarithmic)
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Charging scheme 2025 proposal (logarithmic)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Claudius Zingerli
claudius.zingerli at ksz.ch
Sat Apr 20 11:44:18 CEST 2024
Hi Sebastien, I think IPv6 allocations larger than /29 aren't very common. Your proposal again puts too much load on smaller LIRs. I strongly prefer the several proposed linear models like: - 0.01 to 0.1 EUR per IPv4/32 (multiple proposals) - 7.92 EUR per IPv4/24 (my proposal of 2024-04-12 => Neutral to current RIPE NCC budget) - 20 EUR per IPv4/24 for the first 1750 /24 (James A.T. Rice's proposal of 2024-04-19) @RIPE: I would like to see at least one of the above models to choose from. @Sebastien: Your proposal is by FAR the most expensive for smaller LIRs: Your Cost for the smaller LIRs following the proposed parameters: 1st /24: free 1st /23: 217 (EUR 109 per /24) 1st /22: 501 (EUR 125 per /24) 1st /21: 873 (EUR 108 per /24) 1st /20: 1361 (EUR 85 per /24) 1st /19: 2000 (EUR 62 per /24) 1st /18: 2837 (EUR 44 per /24) Regards, Claudius -- Kantonsschule Zug/AS34288 Claudius Zingerli, Dr. sc. ETH Zürich Technischer Leiter Informatik, NOC Luessiweg 24 6300 Zug Switzerland claudius.zingerli at ksz.ch Tel: +41 41 728 1212 Direkt: +41 41 728 1307 On 20.04.24 10:32, Sebastien Brossier wrote: > On 16/04/2024 16:37, Mihail Fedorov wrote: >> I once again advise to put less charges on IPv6. Genrally it’s a good and correct approach. But in current reality this will result need to restructure v6 subnets for everyone, who opted into /29 but using /32 (which is what many small LIRs do) and create additional work for everyone. In some distant future there will be no difference but for now every occasion to motivate networks to have IPv6 should be valued. >> >> Apart from that that’s the scheme I would be happy to vote for. > > Finally found some time to test some variants. > Alternative parameters, where you can have up to /29 IPv6 at base fee (same total budget): > > Base_Fee = 700 EUR > Bit_Factor = 1.31 > Minimum_Fee = Base_Fee > Offset_IPv4 = 8 > Offset_IPv6 = 27 > > No allocations: 700 EUR > IPv4 /24 and/or IPv6 /29: 700 EUR > IPv4 /23 and/or IPv6 /28: 917 EUR > IPv4 /22 and/or IPv6 /27: 1201 EUR > IPv4 /21 and/or IPv6 /26: 1573 EUR > IPv4 /20 and/or IPv6 /25: 2061 EUR > IPv4 /19 and/or IPv6 /24: 2700 EUR > IPv4 /18 and/or IPv6 /23: 3537 EUR > IPv4 /17 and/or IPv6 /22: 4634 EUR > IPv4 /16 and/or IPv6 /21: 6071 EUR > IPv4 /15 and/or IPv6 /20: 7953 EUR > IPv4 /14 and/or IPv6 /19: 10418 EUR > IPv4 /13 and/or IPv6 /18: 13648 EUR > IPv4 /12 and/or IPv6 /17: 17879 EUR > IPv4 /11 and/or IPv6 /16: 23422 EUR > IPv4 /10 and/or IPv6 /15: 30682 EUR > IPv4 /9 and/or IPv6 /14: 40194 EUR > IPv4 /8 and/or IPv6 /13: 52654 EUR > Largest LIR: 65143 EUR > > > Sebastien Brossier > > _______________________________________________ > members-discuss mailing list > members-discuss at ripe.net > https://mailman.ripe.net/ > Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/claudius.zingerli%40ksz.ch
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Charging scheme 2025 proposal (logarithmic)
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Charging scheme 2025 proposal (logarithmic)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]