This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[members-discuss] Charging scheme 2025 proposal (logarithmic)
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Charging scheme 2025 proposal (logarithmic)
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Charging scheme 2025 proposal (logarithmic)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Servperso
ml at servperso.com
Sat Apr 20 11:26:18 CEST 2024
Hi, That's the model we want to see too and we vote for sure ! We think punish people who own multiples asn is counter productive and always strike loud on small isp / non proofit. It can have a real negative impact on net neutrality (required by icann, to maintain your RIR status) by reducing the 'sponsoring' offer possibility. RIPE board, please add option D with this one and buy this guy a cofee :) Best regards, Le 20-04-24 à 10:32, Sebastien Brossier a écrit : > On 16/04/2024 16:37, Mihail Fedorov wrote: >> I once again advise to put less charges on IPv6. Genrally it’s a good >> and correct approach. But in current reality this will result need to >> restructure v6 subnets for everyone, who opted into /29 but using /32 >> (which is what many small LIRs do) and create additional work for >> everyone. In some distant future there will be no difference but for >> now every occasion to motivate networks to have IPv6 should be valued. >> >> Apart from that that’s the scheme I would be happy to vote for. > > Finally found some time to test some variants. > Alternative parameters, where you can have up to /29 IPv6 at base fee > (same total budget): > > Base_Fee = 700 EUR > Bit_Factor = 1.31 > Minimum_Fee = Base_Fee > Offset_IPv4 = 8 > Offset_IPv6 = 27 > > No allocations: 700 EUR > IPv4 /24 and/or IPv6 /29: 700 EUR > IPv4 /23 and/or IPv6 /28: 917 EUR > IPv4 /22 and/or IPv6 /27: 1201 EUR > IPv4 /21 and/or IPv6 /26: 1573 EUR > IPv4 /20 and/or IPv6 /25: 2061 EUR > IPv4 /19 and/or IPv6 /24: 2700 EUR > IPv4 /18 and/or IPv6 /23: 3537 EUR > IPv4 /17 and/or IPv6 /22: 4634 EUR > IPv4 /16 and/or IPv6 /21: 6071 EUR > IPv4 /15 and/or IPv6 /20: 7953 EUR > IPv4 /14 and/or IPv6 /19: 10418 EUR > IPv4 /13 and/or IPv6 /18: 13648 EUR > IPv4 /12 and/or IPv6 /17: 17879 EUR > IPv4 /11 and/or IPv6 /16: 23422 EUR > IPv4 /10 and/or IPv6 /15: 30682 EUR > IPv4 /9 and/or IPv6 /14: 40194 EUR > IPv4 /8 and/or IPv6 /13: 52654 EUR > Largest LIR: 65143 EUR > > > Sebastien Brossier > > _______________________________________________ > members-discuss mailing list > members-discuss at ripe.net > https://mailman.ripe.net/ > Unsubscribe: > https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/ml%40servperso.com
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Charging scheme 2025 proposal (logarithmic)
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Charging scheme 2025 proposal (logarithmic)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]