[members-discuss] Charging scheme 2025 proposal (logarithmic)

On 16/04/2024 16:37, Mihail Fedorov wrote:
> I once again advise to put less charges on IPv6. Genrally it’s a good 
> and correct approach. But in current reality this will result need to 
> restructure v6 subnets for everyone, who opted into /29 but using /32 
> (which is what many small LIRs do) and create additional work for 
> everyone. In some distant future there will be no difference but for now 
> every occasion to motivate networks to have IPv6 should be valued.
> 
> Apart from that that’s the scheme I would be happy to vote for.

Finally found some time to test some variants.
Alternative parameters, where you can have up to /29 IPv6 at base fee 
(same total budget):

Base_Fee = 700 EUR
Bit_Factor = 1.31
Minimum_Fee = Base_Fee
Offset_IPv4 = 8
Offset_IPv6 = 27

No allocations:			  700 EUR
IPv4 /24 and/or IPv6 /29: 	  700 EUR
IPv4 /23 and/or IPv6 /28: 	  917 EUR
IPv4 /22 and/or IPv6 /27: 	 1201 EUR
IPv4 /21 and/or IPv6 /26: 	 1573 EUR
IPv4 /20 and/or IPv6 /25: 	 2061 EUR
IPv4 /19 and/or IPv6 /24: 	 2700 EUR
IPv4 /18 and/or IPv6 /23: 	 3537 EUR
IPv4 /17 and/or IPv6 /22: 	 4634 EUR
IPv4 /16 and/or IPv6 /21: 	 6071 EUR
IPv4 /15 and/or IPv6 /20: 	 7953 EUR
IPv4 /14 and/or IPv6 /19: 	10418 EUR
IPv4 /13 and/or IPv6 /18: 	13648 EUR
IPv4 /12 and/or IPv6 /17: 	17879 EUR
IPv4 /11 and/or IPv6 /16: 	23422 EUR
IPv4 /10 and/or IPv6 /15: 	30682 EUR
IPv4 /9 and/or IPv6 /14: 	40194 EUR
IPv4 /8 and/or IPv6 /13: 	52654 EUR
Largest LIR:			65143 EUR


Sebastien Brossier