This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2025 Proposals
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2025 Proposals
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2025 Proposals
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Kai Siering
k.siering at team.mail.de
Fri Apr 12 22:56:42 CEST 2024
Moin, am 12.04.24 um 20:17 schrieb ivaylo: > > Flat equal fee for all members = Flat equal resource for all members Says who? > Because IRR and ROA records will be keep unchanged, How/why that? > We must do it equal to all on 100%. with 21570 LIRs and 25029 ASN delegated to RIPE from IANA, we will be fine, each member can hold 1 x 16bit ASN , Also there is enough for the IXPs I hope. There are 21570 16 bit ASNs delegated to the NCC? > Finally If you dont like such fair/equal scenario (RIPE NCC will be obliged to apply it with flat equal fee for all LIRs = flat equal resource spread to all LIRs), First of all, I see no legal reason for your claim, the NCC would have to distribute the it's available resources equally among its members. Other RIRs don't either, and it makes no sense to e. g. force an /16 v4 on us if we're happy with an /22. Needs-based distribution, the current modus operandi, does make much more sense. > a fair and long term sustainable fee scheme for at least the next 10 years wich will cover the RIPE NCC budget and guarantee predictable and stable bussiness climate to ALL ! I voiced for a simple resource based fee scheme – bill any /24 equivalent, any /48 equivalent, and any ASN that is managed by RIPE NCC to the holding LIR – in 2023. And I still don't think the RIPE NCC should continue all current activities unchanged. Having looked at the schemes of other RIRs, maybe some inverse exponential function makes more sense than simply count an /8 equivalent as 65536 times /24. But I'd still prefer a straight formula instead of categories. And a member's vote on any and all activity starting with FY 2025. Regards, -kai -- Kai Siering Senior System Engineer mail.de GmbH Münsterstraße 3 D-33330 Gütersloh Tel.: +49 (0) 5241 / 74 34 986 Fax: +49 (0) 5241 / 74 34 987 E-Mail: k.siering at team.mail.de Web: https://mail.de/ Geschäftsführender Gesellschafter: Fabian Bock Sitz der Gesellschaft Nordhastedt Handelsregister Pinneberg HRB 8007 PI Steuernummer 18 293 20020
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2025 Proposals
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2025 Proposals
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]