[members-discuss] RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2025 Open House: Recording and Slides Available

> Sorry, it is already was discussed.
> It's wrong model with categories. ...

So all other RIRs are wrong ? Only RIPE is on the right road ?

>From what I see "Alpha Net Telecom" still do not have IPV6 (why?) and your
company holds sumary less of 2 x /19 IPV4 blocks so ...

I wrote about my calculation (based on IANA resources delegated to RIPE) 
for charging scheme a week ago: Your company will pay 1500 euro / year and 
RIPE bugdet will be up to 64M - sustainable for the next 10 years. So why 
you lobbing for something worse for you ?

Let me tell you what will happen if we keep going with the flat fee for 
all... Merging Merging Merging in the end will left 2k-3k members (levels 
around 2005). You will be pay then 21 000 Euro and your resources will be 
still same. When 10 other LIRs are merged each of them will pay 2k 
again and will have same resources. how it sounds to you ? What you will 
say then in that future moment ? Do you think you can make a change in 
RIPE charging scheme _THEN_ (when all will waht to keep going with the flat 
model) ?


Ivaylo Josifov
VarnaIX / Varteh LTD
+359 52 969393
Varna, Bulgaria


On Thu, 11 Apr 2024, sdy at a-n-t.ru wrote:

> Sorry, it is already was discussed.
> It's wrong model with categories. It do not anything to decide resources
> deficits.
> It is strongly must be payment for each assigned deficit resource, like
> was the  land tax in England. Only this way making all NCC equal in their
> rights, and will return unused resources to NCC.
>
> WE need to vote at first MUST we pay for each deficit resource or not. And
> it NEED to take in vote all NCC members!
>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>>
>> i dont understand, why RIPE try to punish the small providers, as a
>> non-profit organisation. They are trying to punish the small providers and
>> strengthen or favor big proividers.
>>
>>
>>
>> There are thousends of solution advices from members as i see. Many good
>> offers but also examples from other RIRs. Why still try to monopolize the
>> sector by doing this.
>>
>>
>>
>> For example:
>>
>>
>>
>> IPv4 = IPv4 Allocations /24
>>
>> MF = Yearly Fee
>>
>> AF = Allocation Fee
>>
>> PR = Percentage of the Yearly Fee to the Allocation Fee
>>
>>
>>
>> IPv4                      MF                         AF
>>       PR
>>
>> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> 16384                  1.875                    1.228.800          %0,15
>>
>> 4096                     1.875                    307.200
>> %0,6
>>
>> 256                        1.875                    19.200
>> %9,7
>>
>> 16                          1.875                    1.200
>>   %156
>>
>> 1                             1.875                    75
>>         %2500
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> All the adviced models are very similar and as you can see, for the
>> smaller providers it is so dependant.
>>
>>
>>
>> And another point is, that the adviced schemes are almost identical. What
>> should be chosen, i am not sure.
>>
>>
>>
>> If needed, surely can be found many solution variations, and i am sure
>> better than adviced schemes.
>>
>>
>>
>> Instead of monopolizing the big providers, by advicing consolidation, you
>> should provide some relif for small providers.
>>
>>
>>
>> And in all the adviced schemes the Yaerly Fee for every LIR account is too
>> much for small providers?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Mit freundlichen Gr??en / Best Regards
>>
>> Murat TERZIOGLU
>> PREBITS
>>
>>
>>
>> Bochumer Str. 20
>>
>> 44866 Bochum
>>
>> Deutschland
>>
>>
>>
>> Telefon: 0234/58825994
>>
>> Telefax: 0234/58825995
>>
>>
>>
>>  <http://www.prebits.de/> www.prebits.de
>>
>>  <mailto:info at prebits.de> info at prebits.de
>>
>>
>>
>> USt-ID: DE315418902
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Von: members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces at ripe.net> Im Auftrag von
>> Martin Millnert via members-discuss
>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 11. April 2024 14:43
>> An: Fergal Cunningham <fergalc at ripe.net>
>> Cc: members-discuss at ripe.net
>> Betreff: Re: [members-discuss] RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2025 Open House:
>> Recording and Slides Available
>>
>>
>>
>> Dear Fergal,
>>
>>
>>
>> I don?t envy the challenge of the board with this feedback, but I suspect
>> it is wise to listen to it else the platform for new candidates to the
>> board the next 5 years seems to be pretty straightforward and likely to be
>> elected: Cost reductions.
>>
>>
>>
>> As a side, doesn?t the articles of association allow for membership
>> organized items for AGM to vote on as well?
>>
>>
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Martin Millnert
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 10 Apr 2024, at 15:38, Fergal Cunningham <fergalc at ripe.net
>> <mailto:fergalc at ripe.net> > wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Dear Martin,
>>
>> The Executive Board decided on these draft options at its meeting on 25th
>> of March. So now the Board and management will follow the feedback on the
>> draft proposal on the list. They will decide by 24 April if these will be
>> the final options to vote on at the GM or if they want to make amendments.
>> So essentially the decision on what gets voted on at the GM is made by the
>> Board. You can see the minutes from that meeting here (section 3.3 on the
>> Charging Scheme):
>> https://www.ripe.net/about-us/executive-board/minutes/2024/174th-executive-board-meeting-minutes/
>>
>> And it's worth mentioning that this list is for members to discuss the
>> issues while we and the board will listen. But we will of course reply and
>> provide information to address the points raised if at all possible.
>>
>> All the best,
>> Fergal
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 2:41?PM <sdy at a-n-t.ru <mailto:sdy at a-n-t.ru> >
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all!
>>
>> I want to ask add to vote variant D.
>> All as was before+5% inflation and 10E per 1024 addresses IPv4 per year
>> (counting at 31 december). Can we try to vote it too?
>>
>>>
>>>> On 22 Mar 2024, at 15:27, Fergal Cunningham <fergalc at ripe.net
>>>> <mailto:fergalc at ripe.net> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Dear all,
>>>>
>>>> This Wednesday, 20 March, we held an Open House with members about the
>>>> RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2025. There was a presentation from RIPE NCC
>>>> staff, including our CFO and Managing Director, as well as statements
>>>> from both the Executive Board Chair and Treasurer.
>>>>
>>>> There was a productive discussion about the financial landscape we are
>>>> operating in and thoughts about how best to fund the RIPE NCC. The
>>>> Executive Board will meet on Monday and discuss what we heard this
>>>> week,
>>>> and they will decide on a draft charging proposal to put forward to the
>>>> members in April.
>>>>
>>>> The session recording and the slides from the presentation are
>>>> available
>>>> at:
>>>> https://www.ripe.net/membership/meetings/open-house/ripe-ncc-charging-scheme-2025/
>>>>
>>>> At the bottom of this mail you can find the timestamps for the sections
>>>> of the presentation and Q&A.
>>>>
>>>> We greatly appreciate the input we received from members this week and
>>>> the constructive nature of the discussions. We encourage you all to
>>>> continue to discuss the charging scheme on this list.
>>>>
>>>> Kind regards,
>>>>
>>>> Fergal Cunningham
>>>> Head of Membership Engagement
>>>> RIPE NCC
>>>>
>>>> Open House Timestamps
>>>>
>>>> 01:30 Welcome and Agenda, Fergal Cunningham
>>>> 04:30 Development and History of the Charging Scheme, Fergal Cunningham
>>>> 12:45 Consolidation and Inflation, Simon Jan Haytink
>>>> 19:10 The Work We Need to Fund, Simon Jan Haytink
>>>> 22:30 Summary and Key Questions, Hans Petter Holen
>>>> 27:20 Statement from Executive Board Chair, Ond?ej Filip
>>>> 30:30 Statement from Executive Board Treasurer, Raymond Jetten
>>>> 32:45 Q&A with RIPE NCC Members
>>>
>>> Dear Fergal,
>>>
>>> What is the formal process of deciding what options the AGM get to vote
>>> at, during the upcoming AGM?
>>>
>>>
>>> I would like to suggest a Consumer Price Index based re-indexing of the
>>> costs, using standard European CPI numbers from Eurostat.  We all have
>>> to
>>> deal with increases in costs due to inflation, and it?s fair that RIPE
>>> does not have to fight inflation alone.  Yearly inflation as released in
>>> March 2024 was at 2.4% ?
>>> https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-euro-indicators/w/2-03042024-ap
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Martin_______________________________________________
>>> members-discuss mailing list
>>> members-discuss at ripe.net <mailto:members-discuss at ripe.net>
>>> https://mailman.ripe.net/
>>> Unsubscribe:
>>> https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/sdy%40a-n-t.ru
>>>
>>
>>
>> -----------------------------
>> ? ????????? ???????? ???????
>> ??? "????? ??? ???????"
>> +7(498)785-8-000 ???.
>> +7(495)940-92-11 ???.
>> +7(925)518-10-69 ???.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> members-discuss mailing list
>> members-discuss at ripe.net <mailto:members-discuss at ripe.net>
>> https://mailman.ripe.net/
>> Unsubscribe:
>> https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/martin.millnert%40brainmill.com
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> members-discuss mailing list
>> members-discuss at ripe.net
>> https://mailman.ripe.net/
>> Unsubscribe:
>> https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/sdy%40a-n-t.ru
>>
>
>
> -----------------------------
> ? ????????? ???????? ???????
> ??? "????? ??? ???????"
> +7(498)785-8-000 ???.
> +7(495)940-92-11 ???.
> +7(925)518-10-69 ???.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> members-discuss mailing list
> members-discuss at ripe.net
> https://mailman.ripe.net/
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/ivaylo%40bglans.net
>