[members-discuss] Questions about the published Draft Agenda and Supporting Documents

sdy at a-n-t.ru:

> We need to introduce a fee for EACH IPv4 IP address, and the amounts
> received should be directed to the development of IPv6 and the
> mechanisms of its compatibility with IPv4. For example, the
> development of mechanisms like IPv8.

Absolutely not, the purpose is to remove those mechanisms and have pure
native IPv6 connectivity.

> We should direct our efforts not to reduce the budget, but to solve
> the general problem of the address space.

This problem has been resolved in 1995, it's called IPv6.

In 20 years of business you haven't been able to deploy IPv6, not even
is there an IPv6 network advertised by your AS.

> If we don't use IPv6, it just means we don't need it right now. The
> time will come and there will be IPv6 or IPv8 in our stack.

No it won't. And if there's ever IPv8, it definitely won't be working
the way you suggest it to, or that would be nonsensical!