[members-discuss] Voting for RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2024
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Voting for RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2024
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Voting for RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2024
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Q Misell
q at as207960.net
Wed May 24 14:20:27 CEST 2023
>Absolutely agree! >This voting looks like manipulating. So you absolutely agree with the explanation that STV is fair, but also that it's manipulative? Q Director +44 33 33 408690 <https://as207960.net> ------------------------------ Any statements contained in this email are personal to the author and are not necessarily the statements of the company unless specifically stated. AS207960 Cyfyngedig, having a registered office at 13 Pen-y-lan Terrace, Caerdydd, Cymru, CF23 9EU, trading as Glauca Digital, is a company registered in Wales under № 12417574 <https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/12417574>, LEI 875500FXNCJPAPF3PD10. ICO register №: ZA782876 <https://ico.org.uk/ESDWebPages/Entry/ZA782876>. UK VAT №: GB378323867. EU VAT №: EU372013983. Turkish VAT №: 0861333524. South Korean VAT №: 522-80-03080. Glauca Digital and the Glauca logo are registered trademarks in the UK, under № UK00003718474 and № UK00003718468, respectively. On Wed, 24 May 2023 at 14:17, <sdy at a-n-t.ru> wrote: > Absolutely agree! > This voting looks like manipulating. > NCC now works like not clear hand politicians..... > Serbulov Dmitry > > > Hi, > > > >> The voting procedure is “instant run-off” which clearly benefits what > >> RIPE wants – Charging scheme A. > > > > Cards on the table: my LIR will see a substantial increase in our RIPE > NCC > > service fees from the category-based model, but I do not believe the > above > > is necessarily correct. > > > > To win, one of the charging schemes must get more than 50% of the vote. > > > > If we assume that more than 50% of the members want flat fee, but are > > evenly split between models B, C and D, then after the first round of > > voting, A will have 48% (say) of the votes, and the remaining 52% split > > between B, C and D. > > > > At that point, as nobody has > 50%, the lowest of B, C or D will be > > reallocated to their second preference votes. Presumably most of those > > will also put another category-based option as their second preference. > > > > If you want flat fee, it’s probably important to rank B, C and D > according > > to your preference, but include all of them. > > > > If you want category-based, then obviously vote for that. :) > > > > Cheers, > > Rob > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > members-discuss mailing list > > members-discuss at ripe.net > > https://e.as207960.net/w4bdyj/dg6wG9UL > > Unsubscribe: > > https://e.as207960.net/w4bdyj/cSVNj9YR > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > members-discuss mailing list > members-discuss at ripe.net > https://e.as207960.net/w4bdyj/W98RrL4A > Unsubscribe: > https://e.as207960.net/w4bdyj/PifJdvMi > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20230524/d209af2e/attachment-0001.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 4640 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20230524/d209af2e/attachment-0001.p7s>
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Voting for RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2024
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Voting for RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2024
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]