This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Consultation on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2024
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Consultation on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2024
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Consultation on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2024
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Alex de Joode
adejoode at idgara.nl
Mon Mar 13 16:24:22 CET 2023
Large Telco's are currently very concerned about fairness as seen in the discussion on the nettax/fairshare proposal.We could assume they would therefor be OK with paying their fair dues to RIPE ... </sarcasm off>-- IDGARA | Alex de Joode | alex at idgara.nl | +31651108221 On Mon, 13-03-2023 16h 11min, ripe-ncc-members-discuss at itns.md wrote: > The issue is not a bigger budget. If such companies as Orange, T-Mobile, MTC and many other big players will pay a fair membership tax based on the resources they hold, micro LIR (I don't know if the mean and sense of an LIR can even to be imposed to such a LIR that holds 256 ipv4 addresses, they even cannot make assignments) will have to pay much less. The only fair model ==> LIR FEE = RIPE NCC BUDGET x ~1.1 / RIPE NCC managed ipv4 x all LIR Allocations/Assignments. If the community will not change the charging scheme to such a model, it will be clear that somebody is protecting big players. best, Sergiu 13.03.2023, 10:58, "Alarig Le Lay via members-discuss" <members-discuss at ripe.net>: > Hi, > > On Tue 07 Mar 2023 11:02:02 GMT, Kaj Niemi wrote: > An obvious option would be to reduce budgeted RIPE NCC expenditure to > the level of forecasted revenue. This is what most normal companies, > without assured funding, must do. I totally agree. If we look at the Draft Activity Plan and Budget 2023 https://www.ripe.net/participate/meetings/gm/meetings/october-2022/documentation-and-archive/draft-ripe-ncc-activity-plan-and-budget-2023 Right in the summary it’s written “Other factors affecting our budget include high inflation and costs related to major projects planned for 2023, especially our planned migration of some services to the cloud” So, if the budget is scarce, why continue such project in the first place? With that being the first justification of the budget, it’s not sufficient to increase the members participation for me. -- Alarig _______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss at ripe.net https://mailman.ripe.net/ Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/ripe-ncc-members-discuss%40itns.md -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20230313/b36ac1f6/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Consultation on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2024
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Consultation on RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2024
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]